Світлана Вискушенко,
Олена Мосієнко
(Житомирський державний університет імені Івана Франка)
MEANS OF EXPRESSING EVALUATION IN SOCIAL MEDIA DISCOURSE
In the digital age, social media platforms have become indispensable tools for communication and information exchange. The unique characteristics of social media discourse, including brevity, informality, and rapid dissemination, present challenges and opportunities for understanding language use. This article aims to explore the evaluation lexical units in social media discourse, highlighting the importance of analyzing linguistic features and their implications for various applications, including sentiment analysis, opinion mining, and information retrieval. By examining current research trends and methodologies, this article provides insights into the complexities of language on social media platforms.
Social media platforms such as X (former known as Twitter), Facebook, and Instagram have revolutionized the way individuals interact and communicate. With billions of users worldwide, these platforms serve as virtual spaces where users share thoughts, opinions, and information in real-time. The language used in social media discourse is often characterized by brevity, informality, and the incorporation of multimedia elements such as emojis and hashtags [2; 3; 5].
To investigate lexical units in social media discourse, researchers employ a range of methodologies, including corpus linguistics, computational linguistics, and natural language processing (NLP) techniques. Corpus linguistics involves collecting and analyzing large collections of text data from social media platforms to identify patterns and trends in language use. Computational linguistics and NLP techniques utilize machine learning algorithms to process and analyze textual data, extracting features such as word frequency, collocations, and semantic associations [1; 4].
Studies examining lexical units in social media discourse have revealed various linguistic phenomena, including lexical innovation, slang, and lexical ambiguity. The use of emojis and hashtags adds another layer of complexity to language analysis, as these symbols convey nuanced meanings and emotions. Furthermore, the brevity of social media posts necessitates the use of abbreviated forms and acronyms, which may vary across different platforms and user communities.
The evaluation of lexical units in social media discourse has implications for a wide range of applications, including sentiment analysis, opinion mining, and information retrieval. Sentiment analysis aims to determine the emotional tone of social media posts, which can be influenced by the choice of lexical units and linguistic features. Opinion mining involves identifying and analyzing subjective expressions and attitudes expressed in social media discourse, which can inform decision-making processes in various domains. Information retrieval relies on effective lexical analysis to retrieve relevant content from vast amounts of social media data, enhancing user experience and accessibility [4; 5].
Consider the following examples of evaluation language units commonly used in social media discourse:
Emojis are graphical symbols used to express emotions (happiness, sadness), reactions (approval,agreement).
Hashtags are words or phrases preceded by the ‘#’ symbol, used to categorize and organize content on social media platforms. They are often used to express opinions, sentiments, or affiliations. For instance, #ThrowbackThursday is used to share nostalgic memories, while #BlackLivesMatter is used to express support for the social justice movement.
Abbreviations and Acronyms. Social media discourse often involves the use of abbreviated forms and acronyms to convey information concisely. For example, “LOL” stands for “laugh out loud,” “TBH” means “to be honest,” and “SMH” signifies “shaking my head.”
Slang and Jargon. Social media users frequently employ slang and jargon specific to their communities or subcultures. For example, “bae” is slang for “significant other,” “lit” means “exciting” or “excellent,” and “FOMO” stands for “fear of missing out.”
Reactions and Responses. Users evaluate content through reactions and responses such as “likes,” “comments,” and “shares.” These interactions provide feedback and indicate the level of engagement with the posted content.
Adjectives and Adverbs. Evaluative language units such as adjectives and adverbs are used to express opinions, attitudes, and emotions in social media discourse. For example, “amazing,” “awesome,” “horrible,” “exciting,” “terrible,” etc.
Superlatives and Comparatives. Social media users often utilize superlatives and comparatives to evaluate and compare entities or experiences. For instance, “best,” “worst,” “better than,” “worse than,” etc.
Exclamations. Exclamatory language units express strong emotions or reactions in social media discourse. These may include expressions such as “Wow!”, “OMG!” (Oh my God!), “Yay!”, “Ugh!”, etc.
Opinion Statement. Users express their opinions explicitly through statements or declarations in social media posts. For example, “I love this!”, “This is terrible!”, “In my opinion,” etc.
Qualifiers modify the intensity or certainty of evaluations in social media discourse. For instance, “kind of,” “sort of,” “pretty,” “very,” “extremely,” etc.
These examples demonstrate the diverse ways in which evaluation language units are utilized in social media discourse to express opinions, emotions, and reactions. Understanding and analyzing these linguistic features are crucial for interpreting and extracting meaning from social media content.
In conclusion, the study of lexical units in social media discourse is essential for understanding language use in digital communication. By employing diverse methodologies and techniques, researchers can uncover patterns and trends in language use, shedding light on the complexities of social media discourse. Future research in this area should continue to explore the evolving nature of language on social media platforms and develop innovative approaches to linguistic analysis.
СПИСОК ВИКОРИСТАНИХ ДЖЕРЕЛ
- Boyd D., Ellison N. B. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2008. 13(1). Pp. 210–230.
- Gao H., Barbier G., Goolsby R. Harnessing the crowdsourcing power of social media for disaster relief. IEEE Intelligent Systems. 2011. 26 (3). Pp. 10–14.
- Liu B. Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies. 2012. 5(1). 1–167.
- Pang B., Lee L. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval. 2008. 2(1–2). 1–135.
- Thelwall M., Buckley K., Paltoglou G., Cai D., Kappas A. Sentiment strength detection in short informal text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2010. 61(12). 2544–2558.